Hoogenraad & Haak is a good and reputable firm. Especially Ebba, with whom we work on a regular basis, is an excellent sparring partner in her field of expertise.


Much-acclaimed boutique Hoogenraad & Haak stands out for its insight in the advertising space.

WTR 1000 (2016)

Excellent track record for soft IP advice, covering trade marks, copyright and advertising issues. Experienced in advising across a range of sectors, including fashion, food and retail.

Chambers Europe 2015

Very accessible, excellent advisors. They walk the extra mile in protecting our trademarks and designs.

Coerceo company

Hoogenraad & Haak counsel us efficiently and effectively – absolutely star-worthy.

Alliance Gastronomique

High quality, high speed of service and very pleasant to work with. The only law firm we go to.


The firm’s expertise on advertising law and (promotional) games of chance is outstanding. They always respond rapidly and thoroughly.

Nationale Postcode Loterij

Our advertising law team for many years now. Always high quality. Always quick and clear advice. Creative solutions with a personal touch.


My advice: whenever you feel insecure about the consequences things may have - check out Hoogenraad & Haak first. Believe me, they know what they are talking about. Make sure you never regret not having checked.


"The lawyers are open, flexible and easy to communicate with, which is important in our business where you have to act fast."

Chambers Europe 2014

A reliable partner for many years, whose up to date legal knowledge and network perfectly fit our (inter)national marketing communication activities.

The Flower Council of Holland

They effectively considered our problem to be their problem. Their commitment, drive and the creative solutions they came up with resulted in maximum success.

EVA Optic

Highly recommended for any case that requires an understanding of business, legal and strategic considerations.

UFA Film und Fernseh GmbH (a subsidiary of RTL Group)

They do not only analyse issues well but also suggest creative solutions. Their high quality and clear advice is always quickly delivered.


Lawyers I can always rely on, quickly understand the commercial aspects and always very creative in solving. A big plus for me is that I can link them directly with the business, which means they are very practicable, easy to communicate with and quick.

Thomas Cook

The lawyers here are “down to earth, approachable and lively”, and “handle demanding clients superbly, all while working to tight deadlines and delivering to a high standard - without charging the earth”.

WTR 1000 (2015)

Our trusted advisor on advertising matters. High quality, personable and pro-active assistance.


The pre-eminent firm in the Netherlands for advertising law.

Chambers Europe 2013

Great expertise in both advertising and trade mark law. Very quick and effective in dealing with competitors’ comparative advertising campaigns.

Large Dutch opticians chain

Our trustable firm for IP related work in the Netherlands. Smart, realistic and efficient litigators with cross border operating capacity.


To us, Hoogenraad & Haak equals a personal approach, high quality advice and very fast service - all pro bono.


No copyright protection for chocolate sticks and curls

No copyright protection for chocolate sticks and curls
14 November 2018 - Chocolate is available in all shapes and sizes: from ‘zeebanket’ (typical Dutch chocolates in the shape of shells) to chocolate letters during Sinterklaas (a ‘saint’ that brings presents to children in the Netherlands, similar to Santa Claus). Chocolate in certain shapes can be protected by copyright if it has an ‘own, original character’ (‘eigen, oorspronkelijk karakter’) and ‘the personal stamp of the creator’ (‘persoonlijk stempel van de maker’). In this case a dispute arose between the two competitors Dobla and Chocolate King about an alleged copyright on two-colored chocolate sticks and curls and stealing of trade secrets regarding the manufacturing process.

Dobla states that Chocolate King infringes on its copyright with its similar creations and went to court. Dobla also states that one of its former employees has infringed his obligation to respect confidentiality. The employee firstly developed a machine for the manufacturing of the chocolate for Dobla and later also developed a similar machine for Chocolate King.
The court in first instance ruled that Dobla’s chocolate creations are not protected by copyright and ordered an expert’s opinion on the alleged infringement of the obligation to respect confidentiality. Dobla appealed this decision.

The Court of Appeal ruled that the chocolate sticks are not protected by copyright. There are many sugary (candy cane) and chocolate decorations that look a lot like these chocolate sticks. They show, in other words, no creative choices of the creator. Regarding the chocolate curls (inspired on a shell) the Court stated that these do show a little hint of creative choices in the combination of the color pattern and the particular shape. The scope of protection is however restricted since there are many chocolate curls on the market. The result is that Chocolate King’s chocolate curl deviates sufficiently from Dobla’s despite the mere difference. With regard to the confidentiality the Court ruled against Dobla and considered that a skilled team could also have, without a doubt, produced Dobla’s products for Chocolate King using reversed engineering. Moreover, the inside of the machinery of the two competitors show many differences. The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Court and thus ruled in favor of Chocolate King.

This decision does not mean that chocolate in certain shapes can never be protected by copyright (after all even copyright on blue-white stripes wallpaper was acknowledged in the Netherlands). It does mean however that because of the wide variety of shapes already on the market, protection by copyright is not easily obtained.

Print this article

Share this article:
Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Google+